Page 1 of 2

[S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 7:35 pm
by Chaos Priest
http://www.egscomics.com/d/20020129.html

Blasphemy is a fun word to use while being silly. This comic is a great example of that. It's the perfect counter to any naysayers of foolish plans, which, while usually ineffective, tend more entertaining then a well thought out plan.

Although really when you think about it Tedd is moving in the wrong direction if he wants to try and catch goo with a net. While it probably wouldn't work anyway, if it is going to work then they need a smaller net with less space in between the threads. The goo could still probably ooze through, but it might take it a little while longer to do it, giving them time to dump the goo in a bucket or something.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:20 pm
by kyevan
Chaos Priest wrote:http://www.egscomics.com/d/20020129.html

Blasphemy is a fun word to use while being silly. This comic is a great example of that. It's the perfect counter to any naysayers of foolish plans, which, while usually ineffective, tend more entertaining then a well thought out plan.

Although really when you think about it Tedd is moving in the wrong direction if he wants to try and catch goo with a net. While it probably wouldn't work anyway, if it is going to work then they need a smaller net with less space in between the threads. The goo could still probably ooze through, but it might take it a little while longer to do it, giving them time to dump the goo in a bucket or something.

BLASPHEMY! Bigger nets! BIGGER!

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:38 pm
by Chaos Priest
The blasphemy here is yours, Kyevan! You have perverted the True Way of the Net with your foolishness, obsessing with impotent size which matters not!

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:53 pm
by The Old Hack
Chaos Priest wrote:The blasphemy here is yours, Kyevan! You have perverted the True Way of the Net with your foolishness, obsessing with impotent size which matters not!

Sacrilege! In the TRUE True Way of the Net, size does matter!

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:23 pm
by Tuitsuro
Feed it jellybeans. Maybe it'll turn into a trampoline or a ladder.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 11:44 pm
by Turey
Tuitsuro wrote:Feed it jellybeans. Maybe it'll turn into a trampoline or a ladder.


Yay obscure NES jokes!

I wonder if the graveyard duck is related to the demonic duck?

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:32 am
by raekuul
Turey wrote:
Tuitsuro wrote:Feed it jellybeans. Maybe it'll turn into a trampoline or a ladder.


Yay obscure NES jokes!

I wonder if the graveyard duck is related to the demonic duck?


No, feeding it jellybeans will just make it grow huge and mess with its intelligence.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:08 am
by kyevan
raekuul wrote:
Turey wrote:
Tuitsuro wrote:Feed it jellybeans. Maybe it'll turn into a trampoline or a ladder.


Yay obscure NES jokes!

I wonder if the graveyard duck is related to the demonic duck?


No, feeding it jellybeans will just make it grow huge and mess with its intelligence.

We'd have to do a chemical analysis to determine whether the composition is more like Myrrh or, uh... I think they're referring to ABAHB, but I'm not sure and I've never played it anyway, so no idea >_>

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:22 am
by Illusionist
Jelly Babies, on the other hand, won't do anything to the goo itself, but will summon the fourth Doctor to help out. Celery works just as well for the Fifth.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:24 pm
by kyevan
Illusionist wrote:Jelly Babies, on the other hand, won't do anything to the goo itself, but will summon the fourth Doctor to help out. Celery works just as well for the Fifth.

Tar Babies, on the other hand, will summon someone from The Eighth.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 5:06 pm
by ChronosCat
== Spring, 2006 ==

Chronos:

Yes, quite foolish. (Where did they come up with the idea in the first place?!)

Tedd's persistence is amusing, though.

== August 30, 2008 ==

Crystal:

It looks like some sort of ectoplasmic entity. Maybe they should use a GhostTrap?

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:32 pm
by L0yD3 R33D
kyevan wrote:
Chaos Priest wrote:http://www.egscomics.com/d/20020129.html

Blasphemy is a fun word to use while being silly. This comic is a great example of that. It's the perfect counter to any naysayers of foolish plans, which, while usually ineffective, tend more entertaining then a well thought out plan.

Although really when you think about it Tedd is moving in the wrong direction if he wants to try and catch goo with a net. While it probably wouldn't work anyway, if it is going to work then they need a smaller net with less space in between the threads. The goo could still probably ooze through, but it might take it a little while longer to do it, giving them time to dump the goo in a bucket or something.

BLASPHEMY! Bigger nets! BIGGER!



"it's not the size mates, it's how you use it" Nigel Powers

also....people who use/drive big Weapons/Cars are normally compensating for something, with the exception of Tedd as proven in this comic

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 5:21 pm
by Chaos Priest
L0yD3 R33D wrote:also....people who use/drive big Weapons/Cars are normally compensating for something, with the exception of Tedd as proven in this comic

OK, I realize I'm probably missing something here, but... what?

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:13 pm
by Ginny_Weasel
Chaos Priest wrote:
L0yD3 R33D wrote:also....people who use/drive big Weapons/Cars are normally compensating for something, with the exception of Tedd as proven in this comic

OK, I realize I'm probably missing something here, but... what?


I'm not sure what 'big weapon' Tedd uses that might be taken as over-compensation but, I'd assume in that comic, one could infer that Tedd... doesn't require 'over-compensation', from Grace's comment of 'ooh lala'.

(what's the rating for the forum? Am I allowed to say 'Grace thinks Tedd has a big package!' ?)

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 6:17 pm
by Nightranger
L0yD3 R33D wrote:also....people who use/drive big Weapons/Cars are normally compensating for something, with the exception of Tedd as proven in this comic

This reminds me:
"Well it's just all so amusing, isn't it. I mean only an idiot would assume that this backwater of a planet was safe because you have a few ships with decent shield technology.

You don't look like an idiot to me. So, I have to assume that the reason why you would want to build more ships is, like other men, you like big machines with big engines that fire big missiles because you have a deep-seated need to overcompensate for your own shortcomings."

That's one of my favorite quotes from that show. :)

(but then again, I have a lot of favorite quotes from that show)

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:47 am
by Acolmuno
Ginny_Weasel wrote:
Chaos Priest wrote:
L0yD3 R33D wrote:also....people who use/drive big Weapons/Cars are normally compensating for something, with the exception of Tedd as proven in this comic

OK, I realize I'm probably missing something here, but... what?


I'm not sure what 'big weapon' Tedd uses that might be taken as over-compensation but, I'd assume in that comic, one could infer that Tedd... doesn't require 'over-compensation', from Grace's comment of 'ooh lala'.

(what's the rating for the forum? Am I allowed to say 'Grace thinks Tedd has a big package!' ?)

She doesn't seem to be looking in that direction, following her line of sight it looks like she's looking at either Tedd's chest or Ellen's groin.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:35 am
by Nocturn
That's the key problem when an artist isn't capable of thinking in more than two dimensions: It gets hard to tell who characters are looking at when you have more than three characters in a panel. Luckily that's not a problem with EGS anymore.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:36 am
by bunnyThor
Acolmuno wrote:She doesn't seem to be looking in that direction, following her line of sight it looks like she's looking at either Tedd's chest or Ellen's groin.


Actually, that's Elliot. Ellen didn't exist back then. Her reign of cruel meanness had yet to begin! :cry:

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 11:53 am
by Free Radical
Nightranger wrote:This reminds me:
"Well it's just all so amusing, isn't it. I mean only an idiot would assume that this backwater of a planet was safe because you have a few ships with decent shield technology.

You don't look like an idiot to me. So, I have to assume that the reason why you would want to build more ships is, like other men, you like big machines with big engines that fire big missiles because you have a deep-seated need to overcompensate for your own shortcomings."

Is that all one quote? It seems to change gears in the middle - first the speaker says the planet isn't well defended enough, then says the people in charge are only building more ships because they feel inadequate. Doesn't really seem to make sense...

Re:

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 3:33 pm
by Turey
Free Radical wrote:
Nightranger wrote:This reminds me:
"Well it's just all so amusing, isn't it. I mean only an idiot would assume that this backwater of a planet was safe because you have a few ships with decent shield technology.

You don't look like an idiot to me. So, I have to assume that the reason why you would want to build more ships is, like other men, you like big machines with big engines that fire big missiles because you have a deep-seated need to overcompensate for your own shortcomings."

Is that all one quote? It seems to change gears in the middle - first the speaker says the planet isn't well defended enough, then says the people in charge are only building more ships because they feel inadequate. Doesn't really seem to make sense...


It's two different people talking, silly.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2008 7:25 pm
by Nightranger
No, it's all the same character. The first paragraph isn't the part of the quote I really like, it's more set up.

It's said by the character Vala from Stargate SG-1, from one of the first episodes of season 9, I believe. Basically, now that all of the major bad guys have been defeated (or so they think), the government has decided it wants to basically shut down the SGC so they can shift its funding to making more warships. General Landry and Daniel are at a meeting to attempt to persuade the comittee responsible for this decision that it's a bad idea. Unfortunately, do to a piece of alien technology, Daniel and Vala can't go far away from each other without endangering both of them, so they have to bring Vala too. Which leads to the lines I quoted. She is pointing out that a handful of ships still isn't enough to mount a very effective defence and that only an idiot would think so. She then partronizingly tells the head of the comittee that he doesn't look like an idiot and suggests a possible reason for why he wants to focus so much on ship-building. Needless to say, he didn't find it funny. His secretary who was sitting next to him had to stifle a laugh, though.

The transcript I used to make sure I got the quote correct, if you're interested.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:23 pm
by Loztein
And here I was thinking noone else watched Stargate here, hmm... Do you watch Atlantis also?

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:56 pm
by Nightranger
Yes, and I've seen all three Stargate movies as well.

Re: [S.T.O.R.Y. 1/29/02] Stone the blasphemer!

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:01 pm
by Illusionist
Is this a bad time to mention I loved Stargate Infinity?

PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:26 pm
by Free Radical
Nightranger wrote:She is pointing out that a handful of ships still isn't enough to mount a very effective defence and that only an idiot would think so. She then partronizingly tells the head of the comittee that he doesn't look like an idiot and suggests a possible reason for why he wants to focus so much on ship-building.

Eh, I dunno. I didn't see the last two or three seasons of Stargate, but even in context she seems to me to be the one coming across as an idiot. "Your planet is basically undefended, surely the only reason you could want to build more ships is because you feel inadequate."? In context of diverting money from the stargate program when we know they're the heroes who're going to save the day it might not be the smartest decision, but wanting a better fleet in and of itself hardly seems deserving of that...