Take off your clothes (July 24th)

It's not MAD science...just disappointed.

Moderator: Gav

Take off your clothes (July 24th)

Postby bloodeye on Mon Jul 24, 2006 5:41 am

Still vaugely hoping. I mean, it probally does pay well.... :roll:
User avatar
bloodeye
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 11:00 pm

Postby the Siliconopolitan on Mon Jul 24, 2006 9:21 am

Completely off topic:

I just noticed that the strip is signed upside down. Has this happened before?

It reminds of one of our most provocative modern artists (now departed) who signed at least one abstract painting in all four corners. Presumably Gav's motive was something else.
[i]Si les triangles faisaient un Dieu, ils lui donneraient trois c
User avatar
the Siliconopolitan
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:40 pm
Location: Odense, Denmark

Postby HiFranc on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:14 pm

Maybe he was simply the wrong side of the table when he remembered to sign it?
Francisco
I read several webcomics.
User avatar
HiFranc
Keenspot Juggernaut
 
Posts: 4090
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England

Postby Gav on Mon Jul 24, 2006 1:42 pm

the Siliconopolitan wrote:I just noticed that the strip is signed upside down. Has this happened before?


Heh. There's no conspiracy, I sign upside down all the time.

It's an artistic descision. It's all about filling in "white space."

When I started Nukees, I more often signed right-side up. However, as my backgrounds got more and more complicated, the bottoms of strips got filled in by art, while the tops (where there is more often a featureless ceiling or an empty sky) usually had more white space. However, that's usually covered up by word balloons.

Thus, the white space that needs filling in is most often on the side, especially in a backgroundless panel. So most of my recent signings are sideways.

However, you'll often find me signing upside down when, as in today's strip, there is a panel with no text, because that usually leaves a lot of white space on top.
Lates...

Darren "Gav" Bleuel
(Nukees, an atomic comic)
User avatar
Gav
Keenspot Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 11:59 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA Disposition: pissy

Re: Take off your clothes (July 24th)

Postby HiFranc on Tue Jul 25, 2006 11:48 pm

bloodeye wrote:Still vaugely hoping. I mean, it probally does pay well.... :roll:


Well she did say that she saw the boss then put her clothes back on...
Francisco
I read several webcomics.
User avatar
HiFranc
Keenspot Juggernaut
 
Posts: 4090
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England

Postby bloodeye on Wed Jul 26, 2006 9:27 am

Mmm, but also possible she's just toying with Gav's mind.
User avatar
bloodeye
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 11:00 pm

Postby HiFranc on Wed Jul 26, 2006 3:28 pm

bloodeye wrote:Mmm, but also possible she's just toying with Gav's mind.


But that would mean she's approaching Gav's level of evilness. ;-)
Francisco
I read several webcomics.
User avatar
HiFranc
Keenspot Juggernaut
 
Posts: 4090
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England

Postby Silver Adept on Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:22 am

This is Cindy Lee, not Suzy Gee, right? So it's entirely possible she's got Gav's evilness already and hasn't really done much to show it off.
Sir Alexander, KCI Eqvites Ivbalis, Snufficus Magus Argentus. Initial suggestor of name Order of Jubal. Probi Immotiqve Este!
Now accepting positions in M-Division. Come see what Science and Magic together can make! Apply by PM or post!
And now the creator of my own comic! Go see Faces
Gots a LiveJournal now. It's here!
User avatar
Silver Adept
Keenspot Juggernaut
 
Posts: 3658
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: The Lake of Grass in Michigan

Postby bloodeye on Thu Jul 27, 2006 5:45 am

Plus, she's female. Those are inherantly evil.
User avatar
bloodeye
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 11:00 pm

Postby Gav on Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:11 am

Silver Adept wrote:This is Cindy Lee, not Suzy Gee, right? So it's entirely possible she's got Gav's evilness already and hasn't really done much to show it off.


You guys make me want to make a "Nukees Evil scale."
Lates...

Darren "Gav" Bleuel
(Nukees, an atomic comic)
User avatar
Gav
Keenspot Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 11:59 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA Disposition: pissy

Postby Sluggite RCG on Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:32 pm

Gav wrote:
Silver Adept wrote:This is Cindy Lee, not Suzy Gee, right? So it's entirely possible she's got Gav's evilness already and hasn't really done much to show it off.


You guys make me want to make a "Nukees Evil scale."



That'll be great! You should do it. :evilgrin:
Is It Not Nifty
Worship The Comic
http://www.sluggy.com/
Sluggite RCG
Grand Poobah Keenspotter
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 4:19 pm
Location: In my own little world, but it's OK, they like me there.

Postby Wafath on Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:07 pm

I think that evil is a vector, not a scalar.

Certainly the evilness of Gav is mostly orthogonal to the Evilness of Ceilia, and both are mostly orthogonal to the Evilness of Cindy Lee Gee, and all of them are mostly orthogonal to Mr Casanovacain.

It is also difficult to compare them by simple magnitude. How many acts of attempted world domination does it take to equal 1000 theft & hoarding of office supplies?

W
Wafath
Grand Poobah Keenspotter
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2000 12:00 am
Location: MD, US

Postby Crystalis on Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:32 pm

Wafath wrote:It is also difficult to compare them by simple magnitude. How many acts of attempted world domination does it take to equal 1000 theft & hoarding of office supplies?


Three! *crunch*
-Proud to be a Sharply Shining Point!
-Schlurper of Newbies!
-OT Pope

Drink to the dead all you still alive,
we shall join them in good time.
Should you go crossing that silvery brook,
it's best to leap before you look.

Under Republicans, man exploits man. Under Democrats, it's just the reverse.
User avatar
Crystalis
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 2172
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: Little Rock, AR USA

Postby bloodeye on Fri Jul 28, 2006 6:08 am

Agreed, there are many kinds of evil. Some evils are kinda cool, others are just.... well..... evil.
User avatar
bloodeye
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 11:00 pm

Postby Silver Adept on Fri Jul 28, 2006 7:11 am

Having an "Evil of the Nukees" vector graph would be rather amusing. I'm sure we could figure out appropriate quadrant names. Or if it's in three-dimensions, proper axes names.
Sir Alexander, KCI Eqvites Ivbalis, Snufficus Magus Argentus. Initial suggestor of name Order of Jubal. Probi Immotiqve Este!
Now accepting positions in M-Division. Come see what Science and Magic together can make! Apply by PM or post!
And now the creator of my own comic! Go see Faces
Gots a LiveJournal now. It's here!
User avatar
Silver Adept
Keenspot Juggernaut
 
Posts: 3658
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: The Lake of Grass in Michigan

Postby sun tzu on Fri Jul 28, 2006 11:01 am

bloodeye wrote:Agreed, there are many kinds of evil. Some evils are kinda cool, others are just.... well..... evil.


Yeah. Gav has supervillainy class and stuff, but it comes to quick-and-dirty evil, Casanovocaine has him beat by miles.
"The problem with History is that it can't have a happy ending." -Ouri Maler.
User avatar
sun tzu
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1407
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Grenoble, France

Postby Gav on Fri Jul 28, 2006 1:28 pm

Great, you guys have taken my theoretical "Axis of Evil" and turned it into a "Tesseract of Evil." :roll:


If I had to at least put them in order, sticking with only the main characters for now, offhand I'd say it goes:

1. Gav
2. Teri
3. Dr. Goldfinger
4. Cecilia
5. Cindy Lee
6. Suzy Gee
7. Jeannie
8. King Luca
9. Linus
A. Danny

Actually, I'm not sure if I would put Casanovacaine above or below Gav. Certainly in that one altercation, he seemed more evil, because Gav appeared to take the high road for once. But if each were given a satellite-mounted death ray, how would they rank?

But you guys are right... It's hard to look at it like this on a single axis. There's "self-serving" evil and there's "playful" evil and I'm sure a bunch more. There's also the "Chaos/Order" scale (though Seth would argue if even it was one-dimensional).

Can we boil it down to four types?
Lates...

Darren "Gav" Bleuel
(Nukees, an atomic comic)
User avatar
Gav
Keenspot Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 11:59 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA Disposition: pissy

Postby kiga on Fri Jul 28, 2006 8:59 pm

Like a Meyers-Briggs test?

How's this:

E = prefers whatever is most entertaining
G = prefers whatever achieves the current goal

M = focuses on achieving the misery of others
H = focuses on achieving happiness of others

R = see your happiness as achieved relative to the happiness of others (you feel happier if others are more miserable)
T = Others' happiness contributes positively to your own

S = focused on mainly what is happening to yourself
O = focused on others more than yourself
Kevin Iga
2+2=5 for sufficiently large values of 2
kiga
Keenspotter Supreme
 
Posts: 90
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: Pepperdine University

Postby Sluggite RCG on Sat Jul 29, 2006 3:51 pm

E&G sound like Gav. :evilgrin:
M fits Scott Adams definition of an @$$h013. :evil:
Is It Not Nifty
Worship The Comic
http://www.sluggy.com/
Sluggite RCG
Grand Poobah Keenspotter
 
Posts: 649
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 4:19 pm
Location: In my own little world, but it's OK, they like me there.

Postby HiFranc on Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:52 pm

E&G are not necessarily evil. However, either end of the scale can describe both good and evil.
Francisco
I read several webcomics.
User avatar
HiFranc
Keenspot Juggernaut
 
Posts: 4090
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England

Postby sun tzu on Mon Jul 31, 2006 5:18 am

Hm. Perhaps we need two factors:
-Selfishness level (Se): To what extent the individual is willing to hurt others to further his own goal.
-Sadism level (Sa): To what extent hurting others is the individual's goal.
One might argue that Casanovocaine has a higher Se than Gav - he was willing to resort to rape, which was beneath Gaviscon Aviscena V. Vandarin, however, has a higher Sa - Casanovocaine resorted to rape because he wanted to fulfill his sexual needs, while Gav messes with people's minds even when there is no profit involved - he considers it fun.
And then, of course, there's skill. Casanovocaine can only hurt so many people; Gav could, conceivably, make life hellish for very large crowds. His takeover of Nukeeland, his courtroom war...These illustrate that he can be a serious powerplayer when the occasion presents itself.
"The problem with History is that it can't have a happy ending." -Ouri Maler.
User avatar
sun tzu
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1407
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2002 4:00 pm
Location: Grenoble, France

Postby John Campbell on Tue Aug 15, 2006 8:58 am

I think the missing axis is Madness.

Gav is high on both Evil and Madness scales.

Danny and King Luca are high on the Madness scale, but low on the Evil scale.

Suzy Gee is moderate on both Evil and Madness scales (with both values trending upwards over time).

Cindy Lee is moderate on the Evil scale and fairly low on the Madness scale.

Casanovacaine is high on the Evil scale, but low on the Madness scale.

Teri would seem to be high on both Evil and Madness, but I actually think that, as a being controlled by strict logical imperatives, she has (as another Terry says) actually gone so far into Sanity that she came out the other side. (I think this implies that we're graphing this on a torus.)

Cecilia's fairly high on the Evil scale, and very high on the Madness scale.

Possibly we need a third axis, Science (for the Evil Mad Science trifecta), to distinguish between people like Cecilia (high Evil, high Madness, low Science) and Gav (high Evil, high Madness, high Science).


(Only here would a thread about cute girls undressing polymorph into a thread about graphing evilness.)
John Campbell
Grand Poobah Keenspotter
 
Posts: 415
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:00 pm
Location: The Republic of Vermont

Postby Gav on Tue Aug 15, 2006 11:33 am

Hey, I like that.

Actually, this is starting to fall a bit into the Myers-Briggs patterns. Or, actually, even more like the OkCupid Test personalities:

Deliberate/Random = Order/Chaos
Gentle/Brutal = Good/Evil
Master/Dreamer = Sanity/Madness
Sex/Love = Selfishness/Sadism

This last one might seem controversial, but I think it works as a single axis. sun tzu suggested two different axes, but I think one could make an arguement for a single scale. You're either evil to advance your own causes, or you're evil simply to hurt others--or for the sheer "fun" of it (ie: sadism). What do you guys think? Gav might actually be in the middle of that scale, with Casanovacaine on the "Selfish" side and Cecilia on the "Sadism" side.

I might turn this into an OkCupid test when I'm done, and you can test yourself and find out what Nukees character you are more like. In terms of evilness, that is.

The "Science/Non-Science" might help catagorize Nukees characters, but I don't think it specifically relates to evil axes, other than in terms of style.
Lates...

Darren "Gav" Bleuel
(Nukees, an atomic comic)
User avatar
Gav
Keenspot Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 11:59 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA Disposition: pissy

Postby Sidhekin on Tue Aug 15, 2006 12:40 pm

Gav wrote:Deliberate/Random = Order/Chaos
Gentle/Brutal = Good/Evil
Master/Dreamer = Sanity/Madness
Sex/Love = Selfishness/Sadism

I don't think the 2nd and the 4th are quite independent parameters. 8)

May I suggest Introversion/Extroversion as the 4th? Then Introversion + Evil => selfishness while Extroversion + Evil => sadism.

(I guess that means Extroversion + Good => generosity while Introversion + Good => rigteousness?)
perl -e 'print "Just another Perl ${\(trickster and hacker)},";'

The Sidhekin proves that Sidhe did it!
User avatar
Sidhekin
Keenspot Despot
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 11:49 pm
Location: Bergen, Norway

Postby Gav on Tue Aug 15, 2006 1:29 pm

Sidhekin wrote:
Gav wrote:Deliberate/Random = Order/Chaos
Gentle/Brutal = Good/Evil
Master/Dreamer = Sanity/Madness
Sex/Love = Selfishness/Sadism

I don't think the 2nd and the 4th are quite independent parameters. 8)

May I suggest Introversion/Extroversion as the 4th? Then Introversion + Evil => selfishness while Extroversion + Evil => sadism.

(I guess that means Extroversion + Good => generosity while Introversion + Good => rigteousness?)


Ah, but see, I'm not trying to re-develop a Myers-Briggs test. It's not supposed to be a "personality type" matrix at all. I'm trying to catagorize the different forms of evilness, not the different types of personalities.

Extroversion and Introversion are not forms of evilness.
Lates...

Darren "Gav" Bleuel
(Nukees, an atomic comic)
User avatar
Gav
Keenspot Whipping Boy
 
Posts: 4014
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2000 11:59 pm
Location: Berkeley, CA Disposition: pissy

 
Next

Return to Nukees

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron