[OT] Odd question for the physicists

It's not MAD science...just disappointed.

Moderator: Gav

[OT] Odd question for the physicists

Postby Schol-R-LEA on Thu May 08, 2008 3:17 pm

Now, I should mention that I am not a mathematician or physicist in any way, shape or form (otherwise, I wouldn't still be taking a basic Linear Algebra course five months short of my 40th birthday). I know just enough to realize that what I'm about to ask is absolutely nuts; still, the idea just interests me enough to ask about it.

I was reading a bit in a textbook on elementary Euclidean n-space vector, drifting into the hypnogogic state often induced by the prose of such works, when one of the comments it made brought me to attention:
Anton and Rorres wrote:[A]n order n-tuple can be viewed as either a "generalized point" or a "generalized vector" - the distinction is mathematically unimportant. [emphasis added]

For some reason, it struck me that this sounded familiar - namely, it vaguely resembled the descriptions of wave-particle duality in some popular (in the sense of "for the non-mathematical layman") books about modern physics ('modern' being 'after 1900'). It seemed to me also to have a vague homology to the uncertainty principle, though I couldn't quite put a finger on how.

Now, before anyone says anything, I already know that this isn't even vaguely right. I've briefly read up on these subjects (on Wikipedia and such-like, but even so, better than what I knew already) and could readily see that I'm being silly - the mathematics involved in those two phenomena are not only vastly different, they are not especially related to each other. Still, the idea seems to be sticking in my mind at the moment, and I could use to have someone tear it apart specifically - or at the very least, to air the idea for others to laugh at. Think if it as me lancing a mental boil, if you will.

Fire when ready.
First Speaker, Last Eristic Church of Finagle and Holy Bisexuality || Keeper of the Tent Peg of Homosexuality +5
How long have you been a Mad Scientist?
#define KINSEY (rand() % 7) // Oinos! Oinos! Pentadaktyloi phylloi!
You draw it, we misinterpret it. - Bo Lindbergh
Realitas vestri renuo, sufficioque mei.// moderator of the GenderShifters LJ community
User avatar
Keenspot Despot
Posts: 1742
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2001 11:00 pm
Location: The People's Republic of Berkeley

Re: [OT] Odd question for the physicists

Postby bloodeye on Fri May 09, 2008 6:35 am

I'm not a physicist either. Tried it, but made it to thermodynamics before I burned out (no pun intended).

That said, I'm not certain as to what you're saying, but seems to me the link between an object being viewed either at a location or with a velocity fits with all the mentioned areas.
User avatar
Keenspot Despot
Posts: 1630
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2001 11:00 pm

Re: [OT] Odd question for the physicists

Postby suicide junkie on Sun May 25, 2008 2:18 pm

You are given an N-tuple: {A0, A1, ..., AN}

In 3D space, that might be {5, 3, 0}
You can use it as a position (corner of 5th street and 3rd avenue, main lobby)
or a vector (go 5 blocks north, three blocks east and you're there)
Wielder of the 30-inch sniper rifle.
User avatar
suicide junkie
Grand Poobah Keenspotter
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2001 12:00 am
Location: ON, CA


Return to Nukees

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests