Moderators: Kisai, Chris Crosby
ShineDog wrote:i found out bobby was banned from the space forums. i thought that was HILARIOUS.
its amazing how dead these forums are actually.
ShineDog wrote:i found out bobby was banned from the space forums. i thought that was HILARIOUS.
its amazing how dead these forums are actually.
BoxJam wrote:This is despicable. Howard and his wife don't deserve this. You owe both of them an apology.
Gav, if pointless insults are bannable, Bobby should be banned.
Kurtz wrote:Darren,
I say this with all my heart.
You are a complete and utter FUCKWAD.

Gav wrote:BoxJam wrote:This is despicable. Howard and his wife don't deserve this. You owe both of them an apology.
Gav, if pointless insults are bannable, Bobby should be banned.
It is. They don't. He does.
But everyone gets one warning.
Gav wrote:Gianna wrote:Pupkin wrote:Howard Tayler wrote:You know, if you want your criticism to be taken seriously, you should consider not resorting to personal attacks to get attention.
Please explain that because it makes no sense.
It makes sense to me. If you make a very good point in a discussion, and then call the person you're talking to an asshat, or worse, it doesn't make your point less valid but it robs you of all credibility. People will just think you're an idiot or a troll, and then it's an uphill struggle to make yourself heard.
This is true. I can cite an example. This one. I am no longer taking any of offbeat's criticisms of our site seriously.
I also skip over most of Pupkin's posts.
Just a warning: If you guys start slinging pointless insults again, I will ban your asses. Play nice.

Lepas loves art wrote:This topic needs to go away.
Jamie wrote:I don't think it's just the webcomic community. I seriously believe most of the human race is this fucked up.
communist trees wrote:The second was from the "Why does Keenspot's Webdesign Suck" thread, for those who don't know. Now, perhaps sometimes I take things too literally, but wasn't this a (recent) general warning about you (Gav) banning people for further insulting each other? Does this mean that people actually get more than one warning, that your threats lack follow throw, or that every warning should be taken to have an implied "but only if you do it in this thread" after them?
Just wondering for future reference and all...
carsonfire wrote:Have to have some hope for the human race.
carsonfire wrote:If it does seem that I attacked anybody, btw, I apologize for that. My original comments on Tycho and Scott were meant as criticisms of conduct, and not meant as attacks on them or their art. It was, ironically, the act of always being on the attack that I was criticizing, and it is by no means unique to them.
carsonfire wrote:Just so there's no confusion on the point, I hereby give Scott retroactive permission to trace that pinup.
ShineDog wrote:well, admin (redwolf) on KS told me about it, and moderator (mcduffies) confirmed it - which would be why people think its so.
interesting.
mcDuffies wrote:Hey, I might be wrong (although I don't suffer from memory lapses) but Wolf definitely knows who was banned from the forum he's admining.
mcDuffies wrote:Funny thing, for a long time I had a theory that Bobby doesn't exist and that his entire persona, including his comics, is just some kind of crazy prank by Chris.

Pupkin wrote:mcDuffies wrote:Funny thing, for a long time I had a theory that Bobby doesn't exist and that his entire persona, including his comics, is just some kind of crazy prank by Chris.
Yeah, you and thousands of other people, even though it makes absolutely no sense and was proven to be wrong a billion times and right from the start.
mcDuffies wrote:No, I think it was only me, you probably recall of the last time I was saying that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest